↓ Skip to main content

Are vitamins A and D important in the development of food allergy and how are they best measured?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Biochemistry, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are vitamins A and D important in the development of food allergy and how are they best measured?
Published in
Clinical Biochemistry, February 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.01.033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosita Zakariaeeabkoo, Katrina J. Allen, Jennifer J. Koplin, Peter Vuillermin, Ronda F. Greaves

Abstract

Food allergy has a dramatic impact on a child's (and their family's) quality of life and places a major financial burden on the community. It has been hypothesized that the increase in food allergy may relate to the concordant rise in prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency. More recently a second hypothesis has implicated vitamin A sufficiency in the development of immune tolerance. Together, these hypotheses have prompted investigation into the circulating levels of vitamins A and D in relation to food allergy prevalence. This review aims to examine the relationship between vitamins A and D and food allergy. The first part of this review presents the available epidemiological data which proposes a dramatic increase of food allergy and related anaphylaxis during the last two decades. There is some indirect evidence that variation in food allergy prevalence within countries might be linked with ambient ultra violet radiation exposure and thus potentially with vitamin D levels. Only a few studies to date have directly examined the relationship between measured serum vitamin D levels and either food sensitization or allergy. The significance of vitamin A in food allergy prevalence is only provided through a hypothetical association due to its role in the immune system. The second part of this review discusses the relevant aspects of the analytical methods to assess vitamin A and D levels in children. The primary methods utilized relate to measuring the main circulating forms of vitamins A and D in blood i.e. retinol and 25-hydroxy-vitamin-D3 respectively. Chromatographic separation coupled with mass spectrometric detection is considered the gold standard method for both vitamins. These analytical methods should be fully validated for the use in pediatric populations to ensure they are fit for their clinical purpose.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 81 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 21%
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Biochemistry
#1,214
of 2,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,959
of 238,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Biochemistry
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,317 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.