| Title |
Sex-Related Differences in Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Insights From the PARTNER Trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mathew Williams, Susheel K. Kodali, Rebecca T. Hahn, Karin H. Humphries, Vuyisile T. Nkomo, David J. Cohen, Pamela S. Douglas, Michael Mack, Thomas C. McAndrew, Lars Svensson, Vinod H. Thourani, E. Murat Tuzcu, Neil J. Weissman, Ajay J. Kirtane, Martin B. Leon |
| Abstract |
This study sought to examine sex-specific differences in outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| Argentina | 1 | 17% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 22% |
| Unknown | 42 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 51% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 49 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,285,830
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#4,733
of 16,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,751
of 238,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#40
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.