↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL): trends, geographic distribution, and etiology

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Hematology, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
410 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Epidemiology of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL): trends, geographic distribution, and etiology
Published in
Annals of Hematology, October 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00277-004-0939-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonia M. S. Müller, Gabriele Ihorst, Roland Mertelsmann, Monika Engelhardt

Abstract

While for most cancers incidence and mortality are decreasing, those of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) are steadily increasing. Research to define reasons for this increase is extensive, but has not yet resolved them. We have conducted a literature analysis on trends regarding changes in the incidence, geographic distribution, and etiologic factors of NHL. From our own and previous analyses, an increasing NHL incidence at a rate of 3-4% per year was observed for the 1970s and 1980s. This stabilized in the 1990s, nevertheless still with an annual rise of 1-2%, resulting in almost a doubling of the NHL incidence. This rise has been noted worldwide, particularly in elderly persons >55 years. Concerning gender subgroups, a male predominance throughout all age groups is apparent. Although the NHL incidence has historically been higher in whites than blacks, disproportional increases have recently been observed in the latter group. Increases in high-grade NHL and extranodal disease are predominant. Differences in geographic distribution are striking for follicular lymphoma, which is more common in Western countries than elsewhere. Asians have higher rates of aggressive NHL, T-cell lymphomas, and extranodal disease. In the Middle East, high rates of intestinal extranodal disease are observed, whereas in Africa, endemic Burkitt's lymphoma accounts for a substantial proportion. Risks for developing NHL include immunosuppression and a causal link between infectious agents, and lymphomagenesis has also been determined, particularly for human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus type 1 (HTLV-1), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and Helicobacter pylori infections. Exposure to environmental agents and occupational risks have been studied; however, their significance is as yet uncertain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 215 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 54 25%
Unknown 48 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 53 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Hematology
#446
of 2,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,118
of 61,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Hematology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them