↓ Skip to main content

Intussusception in infants and children: feasibility of ambulatory management

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, August 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Intussusception in infants and children: feasibility of ambulatory management
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, August 1999
DOI 10.1007/s004310051184
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Le Masne, S. Lortat-Jacob, N. Sayegh, N. Sannier, F. Brunelle, G. Cheron

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 44%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 81%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Philosophy 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,771
of 4,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,275
of 34,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them