| Title |
The flow dependency of Tie2 expression in endotoxemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-013-2899-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neng F. Kurniati, Rianne M. Jongman, Franziska vom Hagen, Katherine C. Spokes, Jill Moser, Erzsébet Ravasz Regan, Guido Krenning, Jan-Renier A. J. Moonen, Martin C. Harmsen, Michel M. R. F. Struys, Hans-Peter Hammes, Jan G. Zijlstra, William C. Aird, Peter Heeringa, Grietje Molema, Matijs van Meurs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Researcher | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 12% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2014.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#5,017
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,450
of 216,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#30
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.