↓ Skip to main content

Primary Language and Receipt of Recommended Health Care Among Hispanics in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Primary Language and Receipt of Recommended Health Care Among Hispanics in the United States
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11606-007-0346-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric M. Cheng, Alex Chen, William Cunningham

Abstract

Disparities in health care services between Hispanics and whites in the United States are well documented. The objective of the study was to determine whether language spoken at home identifies Hispanics at risk for not receiving recommended health care services. The design of the study was cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of households. The patients were non-Hispanic white and Hispanic adults participating in the 2003 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We compared receipt of ten recommended health care services by ethnicity and primary language adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, health status, and access to care. The sample included 12,706 whites and 5,500 Hispanics. In bivariate comparisons, 57.0% of whites received all eligible health care services compared to 53.6% for Hispanics who spoke English at home, 44.9% for Hispanics who did not speak English at home but who were comfortable speaking English, and 35.0% for Hispanics who did not speak English at home and were uncomfortable speaking English (p < .001). In multivariate logistic models, compared to non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics who did not speak English at home were less likely to receive all eligible health care services, whether they were comfortable speaking English (risk ratio [RR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.97) or not (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.68-0.95). Speaking a language other than English at home identified Hispanics at risk for not receiving recommended health care services, whether they were comfortable in speaking English or not. Identifying the mechanism for disparities by language usage may lead to interventions to reduce ethnic disparities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 99 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 39%
Social Sciences 14 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 21 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2021.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6,057
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,285
of 78,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#53
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.