↓ Skip to main content

Beyond a Broken Heart: Circulatory Dysfunction in the Failing Fontan

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Beyond a Broken Heart: Circulatory Dysfunction in the Failing Fontan
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00246-014-0881-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Makoto Mori, Alfredo J. Aguirre, Robert W. Elder, Ali Kashkouli, Alton Brad Farris, Ryan M. Ford, Wendy M. Book

Abstract

The role of ventricular dysfunction in late morbidity and mortality of univentricular hearts has been described previously. However, a significant proportion of adult Fontan patients who die or require heart transplantation do so with preserved ventricular function. The clinical deterioration in patients who have undergone Fontan palliation requires a broader view of circulatory dysfunction, one that takes into account the complex interaction of regulatory systems affecting hepatic, renal, and pulmonary blood flow, in addition to cardiac function. This review focuses primarily on the pathophysiology of multiple organ involvement in this circulatory dysfunction, with particular focus on the consequences of hepatic dysfunction and portal hypertension. The authors discuss hepatic perfusion, both in health and disease, and review the current understanding of liver histopathology and liver disease in adult Fontan patients and similar clinicopathologic states. They compare and contrast features of postsinusoidal portal hypertension with more typical adult cirrhotic disease. Finally, they delineate the related effects of portal hypertensive physiology on the systemic and pulmonary vasculature, the kidney, and the heart itself and discuss how these changes affect the care of the adult Fontan patient.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 116 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 14%
Researcher 16 14%
Other 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Other 32 27%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 58%
Engineering 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,741,906
of 23,543,207 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#289
of 1,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,628
of 340,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#8
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,543,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,439 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.