↓ Skip to main content

Nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy ofAncistrocladus heyneanus

Overview of attention for article published in Protoplasma, September 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy ofAncistrocladus heyneanus
Published in
Protoplasma, September 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf01287570
Authors

M. Meininger, R. Stowasser, P. M. Jakob, H. Schneider, D. Koppler, G. Bringmann, U. Zimmermann, A. Haase

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Chemistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Protoplasma
#135
of 979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,408
of 29,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protoplasma
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 979 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them