↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide association study for radiographic vertebral fractures: A potential role for the 16q24 BMD locus

Overview of attention for article published in BONE, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide association study for radiographic vertebral fractures: A potential role for the 16q24 BMD locus
Published in
BONE, February 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.bone.2013.10.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ling Oei, Karol Estrada, Emma L. Duncan, Claus Christiansen, Ching-Ti Liu, Bente L. Langdahl, Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch, José A. Riancho, Richard L. Prince, Natasja M. van Schoor, Eugene McCloskey, Yi-Hsiang Hsu, Evangelos Evangelou, Evangelia Ntzani, David M. Evans, Nerea Alonso, Lise B. Husted, Carmen Valero, Jose L. Hernandez, Joshua R. Lewis, Stephen K. Kaptoge, Kun Zhu, L. Adrienne Cupples, Carolina Medina-Gómez, Liesbeth Vandenput, Ghi Su Kim, Seung Hun Lee, Martha C. Castaño-Betancourt, Edwin H.G. Oei, Josefina Martinez, Anna Daroszewska, Marjolein van der Klift, Dan Mellström, Lizbeth Herrera, Magnus K. Karlsson, Albert Hofman, Östen Ljunggren, Huibert A.P. Pols, Lisette Stolk, Joyce B.J. van Meurs, John P.A. Ioannidis, M. Carola Zillikens, Paul Lips, David Karasik, André G. Uitterlinden, Unnur Styrkarsdottir, Matthew A. Brown, Jung-Min Koh, J. Brent Richards, Jonathan Reeve, Claes Ohlsson, Stuart H. Ralston, Douglas P. Kiel, Fernando Rivadeneira

Abstract

Vertebral fracture risk is a heritable complex trait. The aim of this study was to identify genetic susceptibility factors for osteoporotic vertebral fractures applying a genome-wide association study (GWAS) approach. The GWAS discovery was based on the Rotterdam Study, a population-based study of elderly Dutch individuals aged >55years; and comprising 329 cases and 2,666 controls with radiographic scoring (McCloskey-Kanis) and genetic data. Replication of one top-associated SNP was pursued by de-novo genotyping of 15 independent studies across Europe, the United States, Australia and one Asian study. Radiographic vertebral fracture assessment was performed using McCloskey-Kanis or Genant semi-quantitative definitions. SNPs were analyzed in relation to vertebral fracture using logistic regression models corrected for age and sex. Fixed effects inverse variance and Han-Eskin alternative random effects meta-analyses were applied. Genome-wide significance was set at P<5x10(-8). In the discovery, a SNP (rs11645938) on chromosome 16q24 was associated with the risk for vertebral fractures at p=4.6 x 10(-8). However, the association was not significant across 5,720 cases and 21,791 controls from 14 studies. Fixed-effects meta analyses summary estimate was 1.06 (95% CI: 0.98-1.14; P=0.17), displaying high degree of heterogeneity (I(2)=57%; Qhet p= 0.0006). Under Han-Eskin alternative random effects model the summary effect was significant (P=0.0005). The SNP maps to a region previously found associated with lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS-BMD) in two large meta-analyses from the GEFOS consortium. A false positive association in the GWAS discovery cannot be excluded, yet, the low-powered setting of the discovery and replication settings (appropriate to identify risk effect size > 1.25) may still be consistent with an effect size <1.10, more of the type expected in complex traits. Larger effort in studies with standardized phenotype definitions are needed to confirm or reject the involvement of this locus on the risk for vertebral fractures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Professor 6 10%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 15 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,369,403
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from BONE
#3,103
of 4,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,663
of 307,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BONE
#26
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.