| Title |
Serodiagnosis of tuberculosis using two ELISA systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, July 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02867367 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Swati Banerjee, Sonika Gupta, Niraj Shende, Satish Kumar, Bhaskar C. Harinath |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 11% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 22% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry
#96
of 371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,748
of 48,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them