| Title |
PET imaging of focal demyelination and remyelination in a rat model of multiple sclerosis: comparison of [11C]MeDAS, [11C]CIC and [11C]PIB
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00259-013-2682-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniele de Paula Faria, Sjef Copray, Jurgen W. A. Sijbesma, Antoon T. M. Willemsen, Carlos A. Buchpiguel, Rudi A. J. O. Dierckx, Erik F. J. de Vries |
| Abstract |
In this study, we compared the ability of [(11)C]CIC, [(11)C]MeDAS and [(11)C]PIB to reveal temporal changes in myelin content in focal lesions in the lysolecithin rat model of multiple sclerosis. Pharmacokinetic modelling was performed to determine the best method to quantify tracer uptake. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Qatar | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 13 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2015.
All research outputs
#16,042,980
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#1,980
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,654
of 311,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#27
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.