Title |
Walking for Transportation or Leisure: What Difference Does the Neighborhood Make?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-007-0400-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ming Wen, Namratha R. Kandula, Diane S. Lauderdale |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 147 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 19% |
Researcher | 21 | 14% |
Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
Other | 25 | 17% |
Unknown | 25 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 39 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 13% |
Psychology | 11 | 7% |
Sports and Recreations | 9 | 6% |
Design | 6 | 4% |
Other | 21 | 14% |
Unknown | 44 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,943,894
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,251
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,289
of 73,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#34
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.