| Title |
An up-date of Verster's (1969) `Taxonomic revision of the genus Taenia Linnaeus' (Cestoda) in table format
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Parasitology, March 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1006219625792 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brigitte Loos-Frank |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 34% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 18 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,288,965
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Parasitology
#138
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,635
of 40,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Parasitology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.