↓ Skip to main content

Psychophysiological Activation During Preparation, Performance, and Recovery in High- and Low-Anxious Music Students

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Psychophysiological Activation During Preparation, Performance, and Recovery in High- and Low-Anxious Music Students
Published in
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10484-014-9240-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Regina Katharina Studer, Brigitta Danuser, Pascal Wild, Horst Hildebrandt, Patrick Gomez

Abstract

The present study provides a comprehensive view of (a) the time dynamics of the psychophysiological responding in performing music students (n = 66) before, during, and after a private and a public performance and (b) the moderating effect of music performance anxiety (MPA). Heart rate (HR), minute ventilation (VE), and all affective and somatic self-report variables increased in the public session compared to the private session. Furthermore, the activation of all variables was stronger during the performances than before or after. Differences between phases were larger in the public than in the private session for HR, VE, total breath duration, anxiety, and trembling. Furthermore, while higher MPA scores were associated with higher scores and with larger changes between sessions and phases for self-reports, this association was less coherent for physiological variables. Finally, self-reported intra-individual performance improvements or deteriorations were not associated with MPA. This study makes a novel contribution by showing how the presence of an audience influences low- and high-anxious musicians' psychophysiological responding before, during and after performing. Overall, the findings are more consistent with models of anxiety that emphasize the importance of cognitive rather than physiological factors in MPA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 104 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 19%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 24 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 34%
Arts and Humanities 14 13%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 29 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,335,210
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#152
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,818
of 312,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them