↓ Skip to main content

Current and Emerging Therapies in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Oncology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Current and Emerging Therapies in Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Oncology, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11864-013-0230-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Kyle Brett, Michael E. Williams

Abstract

Mantle Cell Lymphoma, characterized by the t(11;14)(q13; q32) chromosomal translocation and cyclin D1 expression, remains one of the most challenging lymphoma subtypes to treat. Therapy can be divided into treatment modalities for younger, stem cell transplant (SCT)-eligible patients vs older, SCT-ineligible patients. For clinically fit patients younger than 60-65 years of age we recommend cytarabine-containing induction and conditioning regimens such as Rituximab (R)-CHOP alternating with R-DHAP followed by autologous SCT consolidation. Elderly patients benefit from R-bendamustine or R-CHOP with maintenance rituximab following induction therapy, especially after R-CHOP. While standard chemoimmunotherapy provides high overall response rates, the responses are not durable and sequential therapies are thus necessary. MCL is proving to be sensitive to novel therapies that may in the near future become useful adjuncts to standard regimens. For example, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and temsirolimus each have single-agent efficacy in relapsed and refractory disease. Several targeted agents are emerging that likewise may transform management of MCL. The B-cell receptor pathway appears to be critical in the pathogenesis of MCL, and novel agents such as ibrutinib and idelalisib that target this signaling pathway are highly active in relapsed and refractory MCL. Similarly, cell cycle inhibitors targeting cyclin dependent kinases as well as HDAC inhibitors have shown promise in early studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 11 25%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,369,403
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Oncology
#458
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,959
of 197,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Oncology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.