↓ Skip to main content

Epstein–Barr virus and multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epstein–Barr virus and multiple sclerosis
Published in
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, August 2011
DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2011-300174
Pubmed ID
Authors

R M Lucas, A M Hughes, M-L J Lay, A-L Ponsonby, D E Dwyer, B V Taylor, M P Pender

Abstract

This review of the considerable evidence linking Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection to risk and disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) builds on the background to the virus and its interactions with the human host available in the online supplement (see supplement, available online only). The evidence for a similarity in the geographic patterns of occurrence of MS and EBV infection (with infectious mononucleosis or EBV specific serology used as surrogate markers), when reviewed critically, is very limited. There is strong evidence however that people with MS are more likely to report a past history of infectious mononucleosis (thought to represent initial EBV infection at an older age), and higher titres of EBV specific antibodies are associated with an increased risk of developing MS. Elevated levels of the latter are apparent many years before MS onset (compared with non-MS controls) and there is a dose-response relationship between MS risk and antibody titre, with antibodies to the EBV nuclear antigen-1 particularly important. The evidence in relation to EBV DNA load in blood or CSF is conflicting, as is that in relation to T cell responses to EBV. Several hypotheses that have been proposed to explain the links between EBV and MS risk are reviewed and gaps requiring further research are identified.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 134 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Master 17 12%
Other 7 5%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 37 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 15%
Neuroscience 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 47 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,711,222
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#2,315
of 7,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,156
of 131,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#7
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.