↓ Skip to main content

Childhood Gender Nonconformity and Harassment as Predictors of Suicidality among Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Austrians

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Childhood Gender Nonconformity and Harassment as Predictors of Suicidality among Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Austrians
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10508-007-9244-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Plöderl, Reinhold Fartacek

Abstract

The role of childhood gender role nonconformity (CGNC) and childhood harassment (CH) in explaining suicidality (suicide ideation, aborted suicide attempts, and suicide attempts) was examined in a sample of 142 lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults and 148 heterosexual adults in Austria. Current and previous suicidality, CGNC, and CH were significantly greater in LGB participants compared to heterosexual participants. After controlling for CGNC, the effect of sexual orientation on CH diminished. CGNC correlated significantly with current suicidality in the LGB but not in the heterosexual group, and only non-significant correlations were found for CGNC with previous suicidality. Controlling for CH and CGNC diminished the effect of sexual orientation on current suicidality. Bayesian multivariate analysis indicated that current suicidality, but not previous suicidality, depended directly on CGNC. CH and CGNC are likely implicated in the elevated levels of current suicidality among adult LGB participants. As for previous suicidality, the negative impact of CGNC on suicidality might be overshadowed by stress issues affecting sexual minorities around coming out. The association of CGNC with current suicidality suggests an enduring effect of CGNC on the mental health and suicide risk of LGB individuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 152 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 13%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Master 14 9%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 36%
Social Sciences 38 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 33 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#15,346,634
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,869
of 3,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,176
of 167,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#24
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.