| Title |
An attempt to analyze the relation between hospital surgical volume and clinical outcome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11748-007-0172-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Committee for Scientific Affairs, Teruhisa Kazui, Hiroaki Osada, Hiromasa Fujita |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 22% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 41% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#92
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,588
of 156,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them