| Title |
Findings of mycobacteria in insectivores and small rodents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Folia Microbiologica, April 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02817414 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
O. Fischer, L. Mátlová, J. Bartl, L. Dvorská, I. Melichárek, I. Pavlík |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 24% |
| Researcher | 4 | 16% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Professor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 44% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Folia Microbiologica
#149
of 801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,258
of 41,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Microbiologica
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 801 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.