You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of blood–brain barrier disruption on glial cell function in multiple sclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biochemical Society Transactions, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1042/bst0370329 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen McQuaid, Paula Cunnea, Jill McMahon, Una Fitzgerald |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 23% |
| Researcher | 14 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,749,004
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical Society Transactions
#522
of 3,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,911
of 171,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical Society Transactions
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,359 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.