Title |
Health-Related Quality of Life of Colles’ Fracture Patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Osteoporosis International, March 1999
|
DOI | 10.1007/s001980050136 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
P. Dolan, D. Torgerson, T. Kumar Kakarlapudi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
Denmark | 1 | 5% |
Italy | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 17 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 19% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Librarian | 2 | 10% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 19% |
Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 67% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,449,906
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#585
of 3,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,739
of 35,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.