| Title |
Colorectal cancer and solar radiation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, January 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00051919 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia C. Emerson, Noel S. Weiss |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
| Engineering | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#5,016,753
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#594
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,896
of 63,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.