↓ Skip to main content

Blind Spots on Achilles’ Heel: The Limitations of Vulnerability and Resilience Mapping in Research

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Blind Spots on Achilles’ Heel: The Limitations of Vulnerability and Resilience Mapping in Research
Published in
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13753-014-0014-5
Authors

Jessica Heesen, Daniel F. Lorenz, Michael Nagenborg, Bettina Wenzel, Martin Voss

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 25%
Student > Master 18 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 20 24%
Environmental Science 19 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 9%
Engineering 5 6%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,404,409
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
#95
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,570
of 225,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them