↓ Skip to main content

Importance and seasonality of vegetable consumption and marketing in Burkina Faso

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Botany, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Importance and seasonality of vegetable consumption and marketing in Burkina Faso
Published in
Economic Botany, April 2001
DOI 10.1007/bf02864565
Authors

Ole Mertz, AnneMette Lykke, Anette Reenberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 85 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 24%
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 34%
Environmental Science 13 14%
Social Sciences 11 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#277
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,377
of 40,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.