↓ Skip to main content

Elevated Blood Urea Nitrogen and Medical Outcome of Psychiatric Inpatients

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatric Quarterly, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Elevated Blood Urea Nitrogen and Medical Outcome of Psychiatric Inpatients
Published in
Psychiatric Quarterly, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11126-013-9274-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Manu, Zainab Al-Dhaher, Sameer Khan, John M. Kane, Christoph U. Correll

Abstract

Elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) is associated with increased severity of illness and mortality, but its predictive value has not been studied in patients admitted to free-standing psychiatric hospitals. To determine the clinical outcome of psychiatric inpatients with elevated BUN on admission and to create a quantitative method of using BUN for predicting deteriorations requiring transfers of psychiatric inpatients to a general hospital we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 939 adults consecutively admitted to a free-standing psychiatric hospital in 2010. Transfer to a general hospital was used as a proxy marker for poor medical outcome. The score Age (years) plus BUN (mg/dL) was used in sensitivity analyses to identify patients with medical deterioration in derivation (N = 523) and validation (N = 414) samples. Fifty-two (5.5%) patients had admission azotemia (BUN >25 mg/dL). Medical deteriorations requiring emergency transfer to a general hospital occurred in 24 (46.2%; 95% confidence interval = 32.6-49.8%) of azotemic patients and 112 (12.6%; 95% confidence interval = 10.4-14.8%) of those with normal BUN (p < 0.0001). Age + BUN ≥ 90 identified 51 transferred patients and had positive and negative predictive values of 39.8 and 89.5%, respectively, in the entire sample. We conclude that psychiatric inpatients with BUN >25 mg/dL or Age + BUN ≥ 90 are at risk for medical deterioration. Free-standing psychiatric hospitals should develop models of care requiring frequent, scheduled medical follow-up and enhanced monitoring for this vulnerable populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 3 16%
Other 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 21%
Psychology 2 11%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2019.
All research outputs
#18,369,403
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatric Quarterly
#502
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,032
of 211,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatric Quarterly
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.