↓ Skip to main content

A New Improved Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol Safely Identifies Low‐risk Patients With Chest Pain in the Emergency Department

Overview of attention for article published in Academic Emergency Medicine, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A New Improved Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol Safely Identifies Low‐risk Patients With Chest Pain in the Emergency Department
Published in
Academic Emergency Medicine, May 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01352.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally J. Aldous, Mark A. Richards, Louise Cullen, Richard Troughton, Martin Than

Abstract

To assess whether the accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP) studied in the Asia Pacific Evaluation of Chest Pain Trial (ASPECT) could be optimized to effectively risk stratify patients with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and allow early discharge of very-low-risk patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Saudi Arabia 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 75 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 12 15%
Other 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Lecturer 7 9%
Other 22 28%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 73%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,225,830
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Academic Emergency Medicine
#363
of 3,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,681
of 168,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Emergency Medicine
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.