You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structural and functional investigation of graphene oxide–Fe3O4 nanocomposites for the heterogeneous Fenton-like reaction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep04594 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nor Aida Zubir, Christelle Yacou, Julius Motuzas, Xiwang Zhang, João C. Diniz da Costa |
| Abstract |
Graphene oxide-iron oxide (GO-Fe3O4) nanocomposites were synthesised by co-precipitating iron salts onto GO sheets in basic solution. The results showed that formation of two distinct structures was dependent upon the GO loading. The first structure corresponds to a low GO loading up to 10 wt%, associated with the beneficial intercalation of GO within Fe3O4 nanoparticles and resulting in higher surface area up to 409 m(2) g(-1). High GO loading beyond 10 wt% led to the aggregation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and the undesirable stacking of GO sheets. The presence of strong interfacial interactions (Fe-O-C bonds) between both components at low GO loading lead to 20% higher degradation of Acid Orange 7 than the Fe3O4 nanoparticles in heterogeneous Fenton-like reaction. This behaviour was attributed to synergistic structural and functional effect of the combined GO and Fe3O4 nanoparticles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 4 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 318 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 87 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 10% |
| Researcher | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 15% |
| Unknown | 65 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 71 | 22% |
| Materials Science | 44 | 13% |
| Engineering | 30 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 27 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 14% |
| Unknown | 94 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,226,756
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#104,785
of 122,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,195
of 226,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#564
of 721 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 721 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.