| Title |
Quantitative Bioanalytical Methods Validation and Implementation: Best Practices for Chromatographic and Ligand Binding Assays
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11095-007-9291-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. T. Viswanathan, Surendra Bansal, Brian Booth, Anthony J. DeStefano, Mark J. Rose, Jeffrey Sailstad, Vinod P. Shah, Jerome P. Skelly, Patrick G. Swann, Russell Weiner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 327 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 112 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 52 | 15% |
| Unknown | 52 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 56 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 49 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 10% |
| Unknown | 61 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#1,023
of 2,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,589
of 72,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#27
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.