↓ Skip to main content

DNA Glycosylases Involved in Base Excision Repair May Be Associated with Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA Glycosylases Involved in Base Excision Repair May Be Associated with Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers
Published in
PLoS Genetics, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004256
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Osorio, Roger L. Milne, Karoline Kuchenbaecker, Tereza Vaclová, Guillermo Pita, Rosario Alonso, Paolo Peterlongo, Ignacio Blanco, Miguel de la Hoya, Mercedes Duran, Orland Díez, Teresa Ramón y Cajal, Irene Konstantopoulou, Cristina Martínez-Bouzas, Raquel Andrés Conejero, Penny Soucy, Lesley McGuffog, Daniel Barrowdale, Andrew Lee, SWE-BRCA, Brita Arver, Johanna Rantala, Niklas Loman, Hans Ehrencrona, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Mary S. Beattie, Susan M. Domchek, Katherine Nathanson, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Banu K. Arun, Beth Y. Karlan, Christine Walsh, Jenny Lester, Esther M. John, Alice S. Whittemore, Mary B. Daly, Melissa Southey, John Hopper, Mary B. Terry, Saundra S. Buys, Ramunas Janavicius, Cecilia M. Dorfling, Elizabeth J. van Rensburg, Linda Steele, Susan L. Neuhausen, Yuan Chun Ding, Thomas v. O. Hansen, Lars Jønson, Bent Ejlertsen, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Mar Infante, Belén Herráez, Leticia Thais Moreno, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Josef Herzog, Kisa Weeman, Siranoush Manoukian, Bernard Peissel, Daniela Zaffaroni, Giulietta Scuvera, Bernardo Bonanni, Frederique Mariette, Sara Volorio, Alessandra Viel, Liliana Varesco, Laura Papi, Laura Ottini, Maria Grazia Tibiletti, Paolo Radice, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Judy Garber, Steve Ellis, Debra Frost, Radka Platte, Elena Fineberg, Gareth Evans, Fiona Lalloo, Louise Izatt, Ros Eeles, Julian Adlard, Rosemarie Davidson, Trevor Cole, Diana Eccles, Jackie Cook, Shirley Hodgson, Carole Brewer, Marc Tischkowitz, Fiona Douglas, Mary Porteous, Lucy Side, Lisa Walker, Patrick Morrison, Alan Donaldson, John Kennedy, Claire Foo, Andrew K. Godwin, Rita Katharina Schmutzler, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Kerstin Rhiem, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Nina Ditsch, Norbert Arnold, Hans Jörg Plendl, Dieter Niederacher, Christian Sutter, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Doris Steinemann, Sabine Preisler-Adams, Karin Kast, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Andrea Gehrig, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Sylvie Mazoyer, Francesca Damiola, Bruce Poppe, Kathleen Claes, Marion Piedmonte, Kathy Tucker, Floor Backes, Gustavo Rodríguez, Wendy Brewster, Katie Wakeley, Thomas Rutherford, Trinidad Caldés, Heli Nevanlinna, Kristiina Aittomäki, Matti A. Rookus, Theo A. M. van Os, Lizet van der Kolk, J. L. de Lange, Hanne E. J. Meijers-Heijboer, A. H. van der Hout, Christi J. van Asperen, Encarna B. Gómez Garcia, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, J. Margriet Collée, Carolien H. M. van Deurzen, Rob B. van der Luijt, Peter Devilee, HEBON, Edith Olah, Conxi Lázaro, Alex Teulé, Mireia Menéndez, Anna Jakubowska, Cezary Cybulski, Jacek Gronwald, Jan Lubinski, Katarzyna Durda, Katarzyna Jaworska-Bieniek, Oskar Th. Johannsson, Christine Maugard, Marco Montagna, Silvia Tognazzo, Manuel R. Teixeira, Sue Healey, kConFab Investigators, Curtis Olswold, Lucia Guidugli, Noralane Lindor, Susan Slager, Csilla I. Szabo, Joseph Vijai, Mark Robson, Noah Kauff, Liying Zhang, Rohini Rau-Murthy, Anneliese Fink-Retter, Christian F. Singer, Christine Rappaport, Daphne Geschwantler Kaulich, Georg Pfeiler, Muy-Kheng Tea, Andreas Berger, Catherine M. Phelan, Mark H. Greene, Phuong L. Mai, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Irene Andrulis, Anna Marie Mulligan, Gord Glendon, Amanda Ewart Toland, Anders Bojesen, Inge Sokilde Pedersen, Lone Sunde, Mads Thomassen, Torben A. Kruse, Uffe Birk Jensen, Eitan Friedman, Yael Laitman, Shani Paluch Shimon, Jacques Simard, Douglas F. Easton, Kenneth Offit, Fergus J. Couch, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Antonis C. Antoniou, Javier Benitez

Abstract

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in the DNA Base Excision Repair (BER) pathway could be associated with cancer risk in carriers of mutations in the high-penetrance susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, given the relation of synthetic lethality that exists between one of the components of the BER pathway, PARP1 (poly ADP ribose polymerase), and both BRCA1 and BRCA2. In the present study, we have performed a comprehensive analysis of 18 genes involved in BER using a tagging SNP approach in a large series of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. 144 SNPs were analyzed in a two stage study involving 23,463 carriers from the CIMBA consortium (the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2). Eleven SNPs showed evidence of association with breast and/or ovarian cancer at p<0.05 in the combined analysis. Four of the five genes for which strongest evidence of association was observed were DNA glycosylases. The strongest evidence was for rs1466785 in the NEIL2 (endonuclease VIII-like 2) gene (HR: 1.09, 95% CI (1.03-1.16), p = 2.7 × 10(-3)) for association with breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers, and rs2304277 in the OGG1 (8-guanine DNA glycosylase) gene, with ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR: 1.12 95%CI: 1.03-1.21, p = 4.8 × 10(-3)). DNA glycosylases involved in the first steps of the BER pathway may be associated with cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and should be more comprehensively studied.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Master 11 8%
Other 9 7%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 32 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 17%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Chemistry 6 5%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 34 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,200,698
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#1,800
of 8,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,723
of 238,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#47
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.