↓ Skip to main content

Incapacitation recovery times from a conductive electrical weapon exposure

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Incapacitation recovery times from a conductive electrical weapon exposure
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12024-014-9551-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

John C. Criscione, Mark W. Kroll

Abstract

Law enforcement officers expect that a TASER(®) CEW (Conducted Electrical Weapon) broad-spread probe exposure will temporarily incapacitate a subject who will then be able to immediately (~1 s delay) recover motor control in order to comply with commands. However, this recovery time has not been previously reported.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Psychology 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2014.
All research outputs
#21,697,638
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#679
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,139
of 228,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.