↓ Skip to main content

Self-selection into laboratory experiments: pro-social motives versus monetary incentives

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Economics, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Self-selection into laboratory experiments: pro-social motives versus monetary incentives
Published in
Experimental Economics, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10683-014-9397-9
Authors

Johannes Abeler, Daniele Nosenzo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 26%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 29 40%
Psychology 8 11%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 20 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,788,157
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Economics
#251
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,274
of 233,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Economics
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.