↓ Skip to main content

A Lifecycle Approach to HIV Prevention in African Women and Children

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
A Lifecycle Approach to HIV Prevention in African Women and Children
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11904-014-0203-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison C. Roxby, Jennifer A. Unger, Jennifer A. Slyker, John Kinuthia, Andrew Lewis, Grace John-Stewart, Judd L. Walson

Abstract

Effective biomedical and structural HIV prevention approaches are being implemented throughout sub-Saharan Africa. A "lifecycle approach" to HIV prevention recognizes the interconnectedness of the health of women, children and adolescents, and prioritizes interventions that have benefits across these populations. We review new biomedical prevention strategies for women, adolescents and children, structural prevention approaches, and new modalities for eliminating infant HIV infection, and discuss the implications of a lifecycle approach for the success of these methods. Some examples of the lifecycle approach include evaluating education and HIV prevention strategies among adolescent girls not only for their role in reducing risk of HIV infection and early pregnancy, but also to promote healthy adolescents who will have healthier future children. Similarly, early childhood interventions such as exclusive breastfeeding not only prevent HIV, but also contribute to better child and adolescent health outcomes. The most ambitious biomedical infant HIV prevention effort, Option B+, also represents a lifecycle approach by leveraging the prevention benefits of optimal HIV treatment for mothers; maternal survival benefits from Option B+ may have ultimately more health impact on children than the prevention of infant HIV in isolation. The potential for synergistic and additive benefits of lifecycle interventions should be considered when scaling up HIV prevention efforts in sub-Saharan Africa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 17%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 32 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 18%
Social Sciences 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 33 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2014.
All research outputs
#18,369,403
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#374
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,063
of 223,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.