↓ Skip to main content

Measuring and assessing the development of nanotechnology

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Measuring and assessing the development of nanotechnology
Published in
Scientometrics, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11192-007-0310-6
Authors

Angela Hullmann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
India 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Croatia 1 1%
Unknown 60 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 19%
Chemistry 7 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 10%
Engineering 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Other 21 30%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,317
of 2,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,493
of 76,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them