| Title |
The carcinogenic risks of modern tanning equipment: Is UV-A safer than UV-B?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Dermatological Research, July 1988
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00440604 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H. van Weelden, F. R. de Gruijl, S. C. J. van der Putte, J. Toonstra, J. C. van der Leun |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,896,809
of 23,935,525 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Dermatological Research
#352
of 1,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,891
of 13,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Dermatological Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,935,525 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them