| Title |
GC/MS-based profiling of amino acids and TCA cycle-related molecules in ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Inflammation Research, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00011-011-0340-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Makoto Ooi, Shin Nishiumi, Tomoo Yoshie, Yuuki Shiomi, Michitaka Kohashi, Ken Fukunaga, Shiro Nakamura, Takayuki Matsumoto, Naoya Hatano, Masakazu Shinohara, Yasuhiro Irino, Tadaomi Takenawa, Takeshi Azuma, Masaru Yoshida |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation Research
#242
of 961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,638
of 110,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation Research
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.