↓ Skip to main content

Legionella quinlivanii sp. nov. isolated from water

Overview of attention for article published in Current Microbiology, March 1989
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Legionella quinlivanii sp. nov. isolated from water
Published in
Current Microbiology, March 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf01569569
Authors

Robert F. Benson, W. Lanier Thacker, Reginald P. Waters, Peter A. Quinlivan, William R. Mayberry, Don J. Brenner, Hazel W. Wilkinson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,392,288
of 25,250,629 outputs
Outputs from Current Microbiology
#230
of 2,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,649
of 13,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Microbiology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,250,629 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,656 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them