Title |
Comparison of Molecular Subtyping with BluePrint, MammaPrint, and TargetPrint to Local Clinical Subtyping in Breast Cancer Patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1245/s10434-012-2561-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bichlien Nguyen, Pino G. Cusumano, Kenneth Deck, Deborah Kerlin, Agustin A. Garcia, Julie L. Barone, Edgardo Rivera, Katharine Yao, Femke A. de Snoo, Jeroen van den Akker, Lisette Stork-Sloots, Daniele Generali |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 19% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 14% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2014.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,172
of 7,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,657
of 188,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#54
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.