| Title |
Disgusting appetite: Two-toed sloths feeding in human latrines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mammalian Biology, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.mambio.2010.03.003 |
| Authors |
Eckhard W. Heymann, Camilo Flores Amasifuén, Ney Shahuano Tello, Emérita R. Tirado Herrera, Mojca Stojan-Dolar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 91% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 73% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#550,202
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Biology
#22
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,267
of 190,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Biology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them