You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Application of Functional Analysis Methodology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavior Analysis in Practice, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03391714 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian A. Iwata, Claudia L. Dozier |
| Abstract |
Functional analysis (FA) methodology is a well-established standard for assessment in applied behavior analysis research. Although used less commonly in clinical (nonresearch) application, the basic components of an FA can be adapted easily in many situations to facilitate the treatment of problem behavior. This article describes practical aspects of FA methodology and suggests ways that it can be incorporated into routine clinical work. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 104 | 57% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,095,147
of 23,660,057 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Analysis in Practice
#292
of 569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,655
of 317,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Analysis in Practice
#32
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,660,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.