↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of pharmacist-participated warfarin therapy management in Thailand

Overview of attention for article published in Thrombosis Research, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effectiveness of pharmacist-participated warfarin therapy management in Thailand
Published in
Thrombosis Research, September 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.08.019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Surasak Saokaew, Unchalee Permsuwan, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Surakit Nathisuwan, Apichard Sukonthasarn, Napawan Jeanpeerapong

Abstract

Although pharmacist-participated warfarin therapy management (PWTM) is well established, the economic evaluation of PWTM is still lacking particularly in Asia-Pacific region. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of PWTM in Thailand using local data where available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2020.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Research
#3,180
of 4,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,075
of 212,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Research
#15
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.