↓ Skip to main content

Positive feedback loops sustain repeating bursts in neuronal circuits

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Physics, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Positive feedback loops sustain repeating bursts in neuronal circuits
Published in
Journal of Biological Physics, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10867-010-9210-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang Otto Friesen, Olivia J. Mullins, Ran Xiao, John T. Hackett

Abstract

Voluntary movements in animals are often episodic, with abrupt onset and termination. Elevated neuronal excitation is required to drive the neuronal circuits underlying such movements; however, the mechanisms that sustain this increased excitation are largely unknown. In the medicinal leech, an identified cascade of excitation has been traced from mechanosensory neurons to the swim oscillator circuit. Although this cascade explains the initiation of excitatory drive (and hence swim initiation), it cannot account for the prolonged excitation (10-100 s) that underlies swim episodes. We present results of physiological and theoretical investigations into the mechanisms that maintain swimming activity in the leech. Although intrasegmental mechanisms can prolong stimulus-evoked excitation for more than one second, maintained excitation and sustained swimming activity requires chains of several ganglia. Experimental and modeling studies suggest that mutually excitatory intersegmental interactions can drive bouts of swimming activity in leeches. Our model neuronal circuits, which incorporated mutually excitatory neurons whose activity was limited by impulse adaptation, also replicated the following major experimental findings: (1) swimming can be initiated and terminated by a single neuron, (2) swim duration decreases with experimental reduction in nerve cord length, and (3) swim duration decreases as the interval between swim episodes is reduced.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 9%
Italy 1 5%
Unknown 19 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 18%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Mathematics 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,298,293
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Physics
#143
of 297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,649
of 180,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Physics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.