↓ Skip to main content

Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Spontaneous and Drug Induced

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Spontaneous and Drug Induced
Published in
Drugs, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40265-014-0190-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert W. Hallowell, Maureen R. Horton

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease characterized by the destruction of articular joint structures. RA is a systemic condition that often affects multiple organs, including the heart, lungs, and kidneys. Pulmonary complications of RA are relatively common and include pleural effusion, rheumatoid nodules, bronchiectasis, obliterative bronchiolitis, and opportunistic infections. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common occurrence in patients with RA, and can range in severity from an asymptomatic incidental finding to a rapidly progressing life-threatening event. Usual interstitial pneumonia and non-specific interstitial pneumonia are the two most common patterns, though others have been reported. Various disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs-in particular, methotrexate and the tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors-have been associated with RA-ILD in numerous case reports and case series, though it is often difficult to distinguish association from causality. Treatment for RA-ILD typically involves the use of high-dose corticosteroids, often in conjunction with alternative immunosuppressant agents such as azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, and outcomes vary widely depending on the initial pattern of lung disease. Additional research into the mechanisms driving RA-ILD is needed to guide future therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Researcher 9 10%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,531,158
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#3,190
of 3,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,540
of 238,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#27
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.