↓ Skip to main content

Glutamate receptors, neurotoxicity and neurodegeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
941 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
974 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Glutamate receptors, neurotoxicity and neurodegeneration
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00424-010-0809-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony Lau, Michael Tymianski

Abstract

Glutamate excitotoxicity is a hypothesis that states excessive glutamate causes neuronal dysfunction and degeneration. As glutamate is a major excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS), the implications of glutamate excitotoxicity are many and far-reaching. Acute CNS insults such as ischaemia and traumatic brain injury have traditionally been the focus of excitotoxicity research. However, glutamate excitotoxicity has also been linked to chronic neurodegenerative disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease and others. Despite the continued research into the mechanisms of excitotoxicity, there are currently no pharmacological interventions capable of providing significant neuroprotection in the clinical setting of brain ischaemia or injury. This review addresses the current state of excitotoxic research, focusing on the structure and physiology of glutamate receptors; molecular mechanisms underlying excitotoxic cell death pathways and their interactions with each other; the evidence for glutamate excitotoxicity in acute neurologic diseases; laboratory and clinical attempts at modulating excitotoxicity; and emerging targets for excitotoxicity research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 974 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 <1%
United States 6 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 937 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 180 18%
Student > Bachelor 145 15%
Student > Master 129 13%
Researcher 102 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 57 6%
Other 143 15%
Unknown 218 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 213 22%
Neuroscience 143 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 115 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 104 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 45 5%
Other 95 10%
Unknown 259 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,460,564
of 25,381,864 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#73
of 2,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,922
of 101,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.