| Title |
Results of the Medications At Transitions and Clinical Handoffs (MATCH) Study: An Analysis of Medication Reconciliation Errors and Risk Factors at Hospital Admission
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-010-1256-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristine M. Gleason, Molly R. McDaniel, Joseph Feinglass, David W. Baker, Lee Lindquist, David Liss, Gary A. Noskin |
| Abstract |
This study was designed to determine risk factors and potential harm associated with medication errors at hospital admission. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 281 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 18% |
| Researcher | 32 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 10% |
| Other | 69 | 24% |
| Unknown | 50 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 34% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 54 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 7% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 13% |
| Unknown | 62 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,053,064
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#846
of 8,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,254
of 104,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.