↓ Skip to main content

Brain repair and neuroprotection by serum insulin-like growth factor I

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Brain repair and neuroprotection by serum insulin-like growth factor I
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, January 2003
DOI 10.1385/mn:27:2:153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva Carro, Jose Luis Trejo, Angel Núñez, Ignacio Torres-Aleman

Abstract

The existence of protective mechanisms in the adult brain is gradually being recognized as an important aspect of brain function. For many years, self-repair processes in the post-embryonic brain were considered of minor consequence or nonexistent. This notion dominated the study of neurotrophism. Thus, although the possibility that neurotrophic factors participate in brain function in adult life was prudently maintained, the majority of the studies on the role of trophic factors in the brain were focused on developmental aspects. With the recent recognition that the adult brain keeps a capacity for cell renewal, although limited, a new interest in the regenerative properties of brain tissue has emerged. New findings on the role of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), a potent neurotrophic peptide present at high levels in serum, may illustrate this current trend. Circulating IGF-I is an important determinant of proper brain function in the adult. Its pleiotropic effects range from classical trophic actions on neurons such as housekeeping or anti-apoptotic/ pro-survival effects to modulation of brain-barrier permeability, neuronal excitability, or new neuron formation. More recent findings indicate that IGF-I participates in physiologically relevant neuroprotective mechanisms such as those triggered by physical exercise. The increasing number of neurotrophic features displayed by serum IGF-I reinforces the view of a physiological neuroprotective network formed by IGF-I, and possibly other still uncharacterized signals. Future studies with IGF-I, and hopefully other neurotrophic factors, will surely reveal and teach us how to potentiate the self-reparative properties of the adult brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 6 11%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 5 9%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2014.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#3,256
of 3,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,322
of 136,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#13
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.