You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Targeting Chronic Recurrent Low Back Pain From the Top-down and the Bottom-up: A Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Peripheral Electrical Stimulation Intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brain Stimulation, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.brs.2014.01.058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Siobhan M. Schabrun, Emma Jones, Edith L. Elgueta Cancino, Paul W. Hodges |
| Abstract |
Mechanisms such as neural sensitization and maladaptive cortical organization provide novel targets for therapy in chronic recurrent low back pain (CLBP). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 230 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 14% |
| Researcher | 26 | 11% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 44 | 19% |
| Unknown | 55 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 4% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 12% |
| Unknown | 72 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,656,842
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Brain Stimulation
#494
of 2,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,928
of 322,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Stimulation
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.