↓ Skip to main content

Canadian Allergists' and Nonallergists' Perception of Epinephrine Use and Vaccination of Persons with Egg Allergy

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Canadian Allergists' and Nonallergists' Perception of Epinephrine Use and Vaccination of Persons with Egg Allergy
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, April 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.03.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marylin Desjardins, Ann Clarke, Reza Alizadehfar, Danielle Grenier, Harley Eisman, Stuart Carr, Timothy K. Vander Leek, Lee Teperman, Niamh Higgins, Lawrence Joseph, Greg Shand, Moshe Ben-Shoshan

Abstract

Studies suggest knowledge gaps about epinephrine use and vaccination of persons with egg allergy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 16 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#2,044
of 4,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,494
of 212,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.