↓ Skip to main content

Age at type 2 diabetes onset and glycaemic control: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2010

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Age at type 2 diabetes onset and glycaemic control: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2010
Published in
Diabetologia, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00125-013-3036-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth A. Berkowitz, James B. Meigs, Deborah J. Wexler

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that age younger than 65 years at type 2 diabetes diagnosis is associated with worse subsequent glycaemic control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 81 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Other 9 10%
Lecturer 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Mathematics 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 28 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2014.
All research outputs
#14,193,746
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#4,312
of 5,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,061
of 200,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#33
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.