↓ Skip to main content

Detecting discrimination in the hiring process: evidence from an Internet-based search channel

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Economics, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Detecting discrimination in the hiring process: evidence from an Internet-based search channel
Published in
Empirical Economics, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00181-011-0496-6
Authors

Stefan Eriksson, Jonas Lagerström

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 27%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 18%
Psychology 13 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 8%
Arts and Humanities 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,332,304
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Economics
#273
of 800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,776
of 125,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Economics
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.