↓ Skip to main content

LIPAEMIC Report: Results of Clinical Use of Intravenous Lipid Emulsion in Drug Toxicity Reported to an Online Lipid Registry

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Toxicology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
LIPAEMIC Report: Results of Clinical Use of Intravenous Lipid Emulsion in Drug Toxicity Reported to an Online Lipid Registry
Published in
Journal of Medical Toxicology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13181-013-0375-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grant Cave, Martyn Harvey, Johann Willers, David Uncles, Tim Meek, John Picard, Guy Weinberg

Abstract

The use of intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) as an antidote has prompted significant academic and clinical interest. Between August 2009 and August 2012, data from cases of ILE use in intoxicated patients in different hospitals on different continents were voluntarily entered into a registry based on the world wide web ( www.lipidregistry.org ). Here, we report data from this project. Participating centers were given access to the registry following institutional subscription. Specifically sought were details of the individual patients' presenting condition, indications for ILE use, ILE administration regimen, potential complications, and of clinical outcome. Forty-eight uses of ILE were reported from 61 participating centers. Ten cases of local anesthetic systemic toxicity were reported; all (10/10) survived. Thirty-eight cases of intoxication by other agents were reported [30 decreased conscious state, 8 cardiovascular collapse (3 deaths)]. There was an elevation in GCS (p < 0.0001) and increased systolic blood pressure (p = 0.012) from immediately prior to ILE administration to 30 min after use. One serious and two minor adverse effects of ILE use were recorded in 48 reported cases (one case of bronchospastic reaction, one case of hyperamylasemia and one case of interference with laboratory testing). In this series of cases reported to the registry, improvements were seen for GCS in patients with central nervous system toxicity and in systolic blood pressure in shocked patients over a short time frame after the injection of ILE. Few adverse effects were recorded. Clinical trials and the reporting of drug concentrations after ILE use are necessary to further elucidate the role of ILE in clinical toxicology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 71 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 5 7%
Other 25 33%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 49%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,369,403
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#604
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,109
of 305,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.